⏱ 3 min read
Price up 24.6% while coin‑denominated open interest fell 12.6%; 64,000 BTC closed and shorts were 89% of liquidations. Options skew flipped after 361 days, with the futures front repricing.
Bitcoin’s sharpest rebound of its two-year drawdown ran on short covering, not fresh longs: price climbed 24.6% over five days while coin‑denominated open interest fell 12.6%, according to a joint Glassnode and Bybit report.
The 24.6% Rally
Glassnode and Bybit analyzed crypto‑native derivatives flows with data through August 23 across four crypto‑native venues, excluding CME. The report finds that Bitcoin advanced 24.6% over five days in August even as coin‑denominated open interest, a measure of active leverage, contracted by 12.6%. That divergence is the signature of a squeeze: prices rise as shorts are forced to cover, not because new longs are being added. The authors quantify the flush as roughly 64,000 BTC of open interest closed, with short positions supplying 89% of every liquidated dollar during the stretch.
Those figures anchor the mechanism. Price appreciation alongside shrinking coin‑denominated open interest indicates leverage coming out of the system rather than being deployed. The liquidation mix — 89% sourced from shorts — corroborates that the dominant flow was short‑side stress. The dataset scope matters for interpretation: Glassnode’s coverage spans four crypto‑native venues and excludes CME, so the picture describes crypto‑native positioning rather than the full cross‑venue market. The time cut is fixed as of the settled close of August 23.
▲ 0.65%
361 Days of Rich Puts
The options market printed the same story. Puts — protection against a fall — had priced richer than calls for 361 straight days. A single session ended that run, flipping roughly a year of downside positioning as the market scrambled to reprice. Bybit’s own volatility index traveled four times its normal daily range in one session, underscoring the magnitude of the shift. In futures, the front of the curve repriced sharply while longer‑dated contracts barely moved, which the report reads as the market treating the move as a one‑off event rather than a lasting regime change.
The first‑order implication is straightforward: positioning, not incremental risk demand, powered the advance. In that setup, sustained upside requires either leverage to rebuild or options demand to pivot toward calls and stay there. With the long end of the curve holding steady while the front jumps, forward expectations appear anchored. Without that forward drift steepening or open interest recovering, the default interpretation remains event‑driven rather than trend‑defining.
Bybit Volatility Four Times
- Track coin‑denominated open interest versus price; rebuilding OI alongside rising price would indicate new longs, not covering.
- Watch options skew; persistent call richness after the flip would signal fresh risk appetite rather than a one‑session scramble.
- Monitor futures term structure; repeated front‑led repricing without long‑end follow‑through supports a one‑off event read.
- Compare crypto‑native venue signals with CME when available; segmentation would qualify inferences about broader institutional flows.
Catalysts With CME Excluded
The dynamic has not fully faded. Bitcoin blasted back above $80,000 this week after the Federal Reserve paired its first rate hike since 2023 with a dovish forecast, a combination that can jolt near‑dated pricing while leaving forward expectations anchored. CoinGecko lists $81,458 with a 24h high of $81,864, a low of $80,815, and volume of $961.3M. Those spot prints provide a live test: if coin‑denominated open interest continues to lag while price holds, the squeeze narrative endures; if open interest rebuilds and call demand persists after the 361‑day skew flip, the market shifts toward genuine risk‑taking. Coverage excluding CME means cross‑venue confirmation remains a key qualifier.
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
🧠 HafidWatch Take
If analysis of venue-level rebalancing or dealer hedging unequivocally shows that the move was driven by mechanical adjustments rather than short liquidation, then the interpretation of the 24.6% price jump as a short squeeze is fundamentally flawed. This would mean that the rally reflects internal market plumbing issues instead of market positioning or conviction, invalidating the core narrative that shorts were the key force behind the price action from the outset.
In late 2017, a sudden surge in Bitcoin’s price coincided with a dramatic internal reshuffling of derivatives positions indicative of dealers’ hedging rather than directional bets, leading to sharp price swings that many misread as a breakout driven by fresh demand. This historical parallel cautions against conflating temporary technical reset mechanisms with genuine shifts in market sentiment, highlighting the risk that current price moves could similarly be driven by transient structural frictions rather than evolving risk appetite.
Daily crypto intelligence. Before the market opens.
Including the Divergence Index — the sentiment gap no other newsletter tracks. Free, every morning at 7:30am ET.
✓ Free forever · ✓ No spam · ✓ 50+ sources monitored
